Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion

Share Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion on Facebook Share Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion on Twitter Share Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion on Linkedin Email Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion link

The County of San Diego Planning & Development Services (PDS) is looking at ways to allow smaller winery operations in Rural Residential (RR) zones. Large Wineries are already permitted in RR zones with a Major Use Permit (MUP). The goal is to support the local wine industry while protecting environmental resources and maintaining community character.

Through the Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion project, PDS will look at how different types of wineries could operate in RR zones under clear and consistent criteria. This work may create more opportunities for wineries to open or expand, while also making sure community character and natural resources are respected.

The project will include:

  • Changes to zoning rules (updating the zoning ordinance)
  • New operating standards for wineries
  • A review of potential environmental effects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

You can also view our Project Sheet.

In February 2026, the Board of Supervisor's (Board) approved an amendment to the Tiered Winery Ordinance relating to amplified music at Boutique Wineries. You can see the Board Hearing video and read the Minute Order detailing the Boards direction. As part of that hearing, the Board directed PDS to explore additional amendments to the Tiered Winery Ordinance that will be explored as part of this project. Specifically, the Board directed staff to:

  1. Review of the 30% criteria for designated tasting/retail sales to only include the specific square footage where indoor tasting and retail sales take place and exclude outdoor tasting areas.
  2. Further reductions of the minimum 200-foot setback for live music from all property lines to the lowest possible distance.
    • Reassess all assumptions and attenuations in the current noise study, including but limited to:
      • Hard Site vs. Soft Site Attenuations
      • Factor in direction of sound amplification
      • Consideration of physical or natural barriers between live music locations and property lines such as structures, walls, trees, or other forms of vegetation
    • Evaluate feasibility of establishing a waiver process that would allow live music closer than the 200-foot setback if approved by property owners or tenants of impacted properties.

We Want Your Input

Community input will inform topics like:

  • Zoning criteria for wineries in RR zoned areas, related to: proximity to homes, operating hours, parking, noise
  • How wineries can coexist with nearby communities
  • Ways to support local farming, agritourism, and small businesses
  • Environmental and infrastructure needs to support safe, sustainable operations and growth

We will develop recommendations for an updated Tiered Winery Zoning Ordinance (Section 6910) with your feedback. The Board of Supervisors will consider the recommendations.

How Can You Participate in the Process?

  • Stay informed by reviewing the information on this site
  • Share information with others
  • Participate in the engagement tools on this site (Q&A, News Feed)
  • Attend and contribute to conversations at meetings
  • Ask Questions

The County of San Diego Planning & Development Services (PDS) is looking at ways to allow smaller winery operations in Rural Residential (RR) zones. Large Wineries are already permitted in RR zones with a Major Use Permit (MUP). The goal is to support the local wine industry while protecting environmental resources and maintaining community character.

Through the Tiered Winery - Rural Residential Expansion project, PDS will look at how different types of wineries could operate in RR zones under clear and consistent criteria. This work may create more opportunities for wineries to open or expand, while also making sure community character and natural resources are respected.

The project will include:

  • Changes to zoning rules (updating the zoning ordinance)
  • New operating standards for wineries
  • A review of potential environmental effects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

You can also view our Project Sheet.

In February 2026, the Board of Supervisor's (Board) approved an amendment to the Tiered Winery Ordinance relating to amplified music at Boutique Wineries. You can see the Board Hearing video and read the Minute Order detailing the Boards direction. As part of that hearing, the Board directed PDS to explore additional amendments to the Tiered Winery Ordinance that will be explored as part of this project. Specifically, the Board directed staff to:

  1. Review of the 30% criteria for designated tasting/retail sales to only include the specific square footage where indoor tasting and retail sales take place and exclude outdoor tasting areas.
  2. Further reductions of the minimum 200-foot setback for live music from all property lines to the lowest possible distance.
    • Reassess all assumptions and attenuations in the current noise study, including but limited to:
      • Hard Site vs. Soft Site Attenuations
      • Factor in direction of sound amplification
      • Consideration of physical or natural barriers between live music locations and property lines such as structures, walls, trees, or other forms of vegetation
    • Evaluate feasibility of establishing a waiver process that would allow live music closer than the 200-foot setback if approved by property owners or tenants of impacted properties.

We Want Your Input

Community input will inform topics like:

  • Zoning criteria for wineries in RR zoned areas, related to: proximity to homes, operating hours, parking, noise
  • How wineries can coexist with nearby communities
  • Ways to support local farming, agritourism, and small businesses
  • Environmental and infrastructure needs to support safe, sustainable operations and growth

We will develop recommendations for an updated Tiered Winery Zoning Ordinance (Section 6910) with your feedback. The Board of Supervisors will consider the recommendations.

How Can You Participate in the Process?

  • Stay informed by reviewing the information on this site
  • Share information with others
  • Participate in the engagement tools on this site (Q&A, News Feed)
  • Attend and contribute to conversations at meetings
  • Ask Questions

Have a Question? Ask us.

Please submit your question here. County staff will review your message and respond within 3–5 business days.

Email
loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Response to the Proposed Tiered Winery Ordinance I strongly urge the County to focus on preserving existing zoning regulations in Ramona rather than expanding or tiering winery operations. The majority of Ramona residents chose to live here for its peace, quiet, and rural character. That expectation has already been strained. With more than 45 wineries currently operating in the area, enforcement of existing operational standards—particularly noise—has proven extremely difficult, if not impossible. Ramona is one of the largest geographic communities in the county, yet it has a relatively small and widely dispersed population. The Sheriff’s Department is already stretched thin trying to serve basic community needs. As a result, noise complaints related to winery operations often go unanswered or unenforced. This is not a reflection on the Sheriff’s Department, but rather a reality of limited resources spread over a very large land mass. Without a realistic, funded, and clearly defined enforcement mechanism, expanding winery allowances through a tiered ordinance will only worsen the problem. Residents have already experienced years of unregulated events, late-night parties, and operational standards that exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. Extending hours or increasing permitted activities without enforcement guarantees will further erode the quality of life in our neighborhoods. Unless the County can demonstrate a concrete plan to actively enforce operational standards—including noise, events, and hours of operation—we must retain the current sunset and closing time of 6:00 p.m. for all wineries. Anything less will effectively sanction all-night events and continued disregard for surrounding residential communities. Ramona should not be asked to sacrifice its peace, safety, and rural identity due to regulations that cannot be enforced. Maintaining current zoning and operating hours is the most responsible and realistic path forward. Thank you for considering the voices of Ramona residents who simply want to preserve the community they chose to call home. on Facebook Share Response to the Proposed Tiered Winery Ordinance I strongly urge the County to focus on preserving existing zoning regulations in Ramona rather than expanding or tiering winery operations. The majority of Ramona residents chose to live here for its peace, quiet, and rural character. That expectation has already been strained. With more than 45 wineries currently operating in the area, enforcement of existing operational standards—particularly noise—has proven extremely difficult, if not impossible. Ramona is one of the largest geographic communities in the county, yet it has a relatively small and widely dispersed population. The Sheriff’s Department is already stretched thin trying to serve basic community needs. As a result, noise complaints related to winery operations often go unanswered or unenforced. This is not a reflection on the Sheriff’s Department, but rather a reality of limited resources spread over a very large land mass. Without a realistic, funded, and clearly defined enforcement mechanism, expanding winery allowances through a tiered ordinance will only worsen the problem. Residents have already experienced years of unregulated events, late-night parties, and operational standards that exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. Extending hours or increasing permitted activities without enforcement guarantees will further erode the quality of life in our neighborhoods. Unless the County can demonstrate a concrete plan to actively enforce operational standards—including noise, events, and hours of operation—we must retain the current sunset and closing time of 6:00 p.m. for all wineries. Anything less will effectively sanction all-night events and continued disregard for surrounding residential communities. Ramona should not be asked to sacrifice its peace, safety, and rural identity due to regulations that cannot be enforced. Maintaining current zoning and operating hours is the most responsible and realistic path forward. Thank you for considering the voices of Ramona residents who simply want to preserve the community they chose to call home. on Twitter Share Response to the Proposed Tiered Winery Ordinance I strongly urge the County to focus on preserving existing zoning regulations in Ramona rather than expanding or tiering winery operations. The majority of Ramona residents chose to live here for its peace, quiet, and rural character. That expectation has already been strained. With more than 45 wineries currently operating in the area, enforcement of existing operational standards—particularly noise—has proven extremely difficult, if not impossible. Ramona is one of the largest geographic communities in the county, yet it has a relatively small and widely dispersed population. The Sheriff’s Department is already stretched thin trying to serve basic community needs. As a result, noise complaints related to winery operations often go unanswered or unenforced. This is not a reflection on the Sheriff’s Department, but rather a reality of limited resources spread over a very large land mass. Without a realistic, funded, and clearly defined enforcement mechanism, expanding winery allowances through a tiered ordinance will only worsen the problem. Residents have already experienced years of unregulated events, late-night parties, and operational standards that exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. Extending hours or increasing permitted activities without enforcement guarantees will further erode the quality of life in our neighborhoods. Unless the County can demonstrate a concrete plan to actively enforce operational standards—including noise, events, and hours of operation—we must retain the current sunset and closing time of 6:00 p.m. for all wineries. Anything less will effectively sanction all-night events and continued disregard for surrounding residential communities. Ramona should not be asked to sacrifice its peace, safety, and rural identity due to regulations that cannot be enforced. Maintaining current zoning and operating hours is the most responsible and realistic path forward. Thank you for considering the voices of Ramona residents who simply want to preserve the community they chose to call home. on Linkedin Email Response to the Proposed Tiered Winery Ordinance I strongly urge the County to focus on preserving existing zoning regulations in Ramona rather than expanding or tiering winery operations. The majority of Ramona residents chose to live here for its peace, quiet, and rural character. That expectation has already been strained. With more than 45 wineries currently operating in the area, enforcement of existing operational standards—particularly noise—has proven extremely difficult, if not impossible. Ramona is one of the largest geographic communities in the county, yet it has a relatively small and widely dispersed population. The Sheriff’s Department is already stretched thin trying to serve basic community needs. As a result, noise complaints related to winery operations often go unanswered or unenforced. This is not a reflection on the Sheriff’s Department, but rather a reality of limited resources spread over a very large land mass. Without a realistic, funded, and clearly defined enforcement mechanism, expanding winery allowances through a tiered ordinance will only worsen the problem. Residents have already experienced years of unregulated events, late-night parties, and operational standards that exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. Extending hours or increasing permitted activities without enforcement guarantees will further erode the quality of life in our neighborhoods. Unless the County can demonstrate a concrete plan to actively enforce operational standards—including noise, events, and hours of operation—we must retain the current sunset and closing time of 6:00 p.m. for all wineries. Anything less will effectively sanction all-night events and continued disregard for surrounding residential communities. Ramona should not be asked to sacrifice its peace, safety, and rural identity due to regulations that cannot be enforced. Maintaining current zoning and operating hours is the most responsible and realistic path forward. Thank you for considering the voices of Ramona residents who simply want to preserve the community they chose to call home. link

    Response to the Proposed Tiered Winery Ordinance I strongly urge the County to focus on preserving existing zoning regulations in Ramona rather than expanding or tiering winery operations. The majority of Ramona residents chose to live here for its peace, quiet, and rural character. That expectation has already been strained. With more than 45 wineries currently operating in the area, enforcement of existing operational standards—particularly noise—has proven extremely difficult, if not impossible. Ramona is one of the largest geographic communities in the county, yet it has a relatively small and widely dispersed population. The Sheriff’s Department is already stretched thin trying to serve basic community needs. As a result, noise complaints related to winery operations often go unanswered or unenforced. This is not a reflection on the Sheriff’s Department, but rather a reality of limited resources spread over a very large land mass. Without a realistic, funded, and clearly defined enforcement mechanism, expanding winery allowances through a tiered ordinance will only worsen the problem. Residents have already experienced years of unregulated events, late-night parties, and operational standards that exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. Extending hours or increasing permitted activities without enforcement guarantees will further erode the quality of life in our neighborhoods. Unless the County can demonstrate a concrete plan to actively enforce operational standards—including noise, events, and hours of operation—we must retain the current sunset and closing time of 6:00 p.m. for all wineries. Anything less will effectively sanction all-night events and continued disregard for surrounding residential communities. Ramona should not be asked to sacrifice its peace, safety, and rural identity due to regulations that cannot be enforced. Maintaining current zoning and operating hours is the most responsible and realistic path forward. Thank you for considering the voices of Ramona residents who simply want to preserve the community they chose to call home.

    Ramona resident of 35 years asked 28 days ago

    Thank you for your comment. The project team has received your feedback for consideration as part of the ongoing project.

  • Share Hi. I highly encourage the Board allow live, amplified music at boutique wineries without excessive setbacks. The community of Ramona loves live music and the pairing of live music with the enjoyment of wine is a critical part of the Ramona culture and lifestyle. Please allow this critical part of our community to continue thriving, our musicians entertaining, and our small businesses growing and prospering. Anything else would be a huge hit to the growth and support of small, local businesses which this Board of Supervisors claims they support. on Facebook Share Hi. I highly encourage the Board allow live, amplified music at boutique wineries without excessive setbacks. The community of Ramona loves live music and the pairing of live music with the enjoyment of wine is a critical part of the Ramona culture and lifestyle. Please allow this critical part of our community to continue thriving, our musicians entertaining, and our small businesses growing and prospering. Anything else would be a huge hit to the growth and support of small, local businesses which this Board of Supervisors claims they support. on Twitter Share Hi. I highly encourage the Board allow live, amplified music at boutique wineries without excessive setbacks. The community of Ramona loves live music and the pairing of live music with the enjoyment of wine is a critical part of the Ramona culture and lifestyle. Please allow this critical part of our community to continue thriving, our musicians entertaining, and our small businesses growing and prospering. Anything else would be a huge hit to the growth and support of small, local businesses which this Board of Supervisors claims they support. on Linkedin Email Hi. I highly encourage the Board allow live, amplified music at boutique wineries without excessive setbacks. The community of Ramona loves live music and the pairing of live music with the enjoyment of wine is a critical part of the Ramona culture and lifestyle. Please allow this critical part of our community to continue thriving, our musicians entertaining, and our small businesses growing and prospering. Anything else would be a huge hit to the growth and support of small, local businesses which this Board of Supervisors claims they support. link

    Hi. I highly encourage the Board allow live, amplified music at boutique wineries without excessive setbacks. The community of Ramona loves live music and the pairing of live music with the enjoyment of wine is a critical part of the Ramona culture and lifestyle. Please allow this critical part of our community to continue thriving, our musicians entertaining, and our small businesses growing and prospering. Anything else would be a huge hit to the growth and support of small, local businesses which this Board of Supervisors claims they support.

    Sonja asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for your comment. The project team has received your feedback for consideration as part of the ongoing project.

Page last updated: 24 Feb 2026, 01:31 PM